Home > Uncategorized > Lessons from Trial: The Indestructible Deed: Joint Tenants with Full Rights of Survivorship

Lessons from Trial: The Indestructible Deed: Joint Tenants with Full Rights of Survivorship

I just had a trial that ended yesterday. Very interesting case that involved some interesting facets of real estate law and provides a good example of why you should get legal advice prior to entering into any contract, real estate, or otherwise.


Briefly, the facts of my case are as follows:

Mom and Dad owned a large Farm. They had 3 children. One of the 3 children (“Bill”) operated the farm along with his wife (“Brenda”) for many years.

Mom and Dad added Bill as an owner to the farm with a deed as follows: “Mom and Dad and Bill, as Joint Tenants with Full Rights of Survivorship”

This “full right of survivorship” language means that when a joint tenant passes away, his or her interest passes to the remaining owner (as opposed to passing to the deceased’s heirs).

In my case, Bill died unexpectantly, predeceasing Mom and Dad.  Under the language of the deed, Bill’s interest did not pass to wife, Brenda, but simply reverted to Mom and Dad.

Thereafter, Mom and Dad executed another deed, this one adding Brenda as a joint tenant with full rights of survivorship.

Dad passed away. At that point Mom and Brenda were the legal owners of the farm.

years later, Mom, without Brendan’s knowledge or permission, in her old age, signed a quitclaim deed, deeding the entire property to her Trust.

Thereafter, mom passed away. One of the children brought suit against my client, Brenda. They claimed that the Property belonged to Bill’s siblings, not Brenda, since mom’s last deed put the property in her trust.

The legal question I was presented with was a simple one:

what is the effect of Mom’s later deed?


The Answer is: nothing.


It had zero legal effect.


Law: Distinction Between Tenants in Common and Joint Tenants with Full Rights of Survivorship


Under Michigan law, there are generally two ways to own real property – Tenants in Common and Joint Tenants with Full Rights of Survivorship. (A third way, not part of my discussion, but very interesting topic, being as husband and wife, or tenants by the entirety).

Tenants in Common

Holding property as Tenants in Common means that each owner holds the entire title along with the owners. . Each owner shares in possession of the entire property, and each is entitled to an undivided share of the whole. If an owner dies, his interest in the property is passed on two his heirs.

Joint Tenants with Full Rights of Survivorship

Conversely, in Joint Tenants with Full Rights of Survivorship, when an owner passes away, their “remainder interest in the property passes to the remaining owners. Simply put, the last joint owner to die takes the entire property.

Another way to characterize this  tenancy is: “joint tenancy with full rights of survivorship” is comprised of a joint life estate with dual contingent remainders. While the survivorship feature of the ordinary joint tenancy may be defeated by the act of a cotenant, the dual contingent remainders of the “joint tenancy with full rights of survivorship” are indestructible.”

This issue was made clear in the Michigan Supreme Court Decision of Albro v. Allen, 434 Mich. 271, 287, 454 N.W.2d 85, 93 (1990).

Put another way: “A cotenant’s contingent remainder cannot be destroyed by an act of the other cotenant.”

Mom’s actions to separate her interest were ineffective. The only interest she could separate was her “life estate” or her ability to jointly own and possess the property during her lifetime.  When she passed away, by law, the Property reverted to Brenda. Brenda owns the farm.



This is a case in point of why you get legal advice before entering real estate transactions.  Know the legal consequences of the deeds you decide to execute.  Michigan law is very clear – mistake as to the legal effects of of executing document will not undo the transaction.   See Schmalzriedt v Titsworth, 305 Mich 109, 114 (1943) “[i]t is elementary, of course, that a mistake as to law will not invalidate the act of a person who, at the time, was laboring under no mistake of fact, or who was not the victim of fraud, undue influence or other form of wrong-doing.” (Emphasis added).





Categories: Uncategorized
  1. May 5, 2013 at 7:40 pm

    One quirk of Michigan law: if the conveyance is to A and B “as joint tenants,” without use of the phrase “with rights of survivorship,” or an equivalent phrase, one of the joint tenants can terminate the joint tenancy by conveying it away, and partition is available as a remedy. In other words, he can defeat the other’s expectancy.

  2. September 12, 2013 at 9:53 am

    Terrific information! Well written.

  1. August 15, 2013 at 12:48 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: